Menu

The Ripple Effect Presents Volume 1 - Head Music

Wed 8th August 2012


rickinopposition

/incoming/200x200-1578876312-1.jpgYou know you're not onto a winning v/a compilation when your predominant thought is "yay, 1.5 songs down; just 21.5 songs to go..."

If you like bands that mostly sound like they've listened to a fair amount of Pantera and Black Sabbath (amongst others), then you'll really dig this compilation. If you really dig heavy stoner in general, then you probably can't go too wrong with this for a fun listen. Lots of fuzziness, solos, stoner riffs, and gruff pseudo-bluesy vocals. A lot of the bands blend into the background in an onslaught of fuzz and percussion, but none of them are bad; merely a tad monotonous across the massive length of the compilation.

It's like a slightly-varied average support act for a band you really like - entirely inoffensive, and you can tap your foot to some of it, but you'd still rather it was over fairly quick. Stubb however were the one band that I felt stood out a little amongst their peers.

It's been released by the two music lovers that run the Ripple Effect website/label, and they do clearly have a massive level of enthusiasm for this kind of sound, and it's both endearing and admirable that they put so much effort into seeking obscure bands in this vein, and then promoting them. For some reason the Bandcamp page claims that one of the two involved in the website is a member of Racer X (the speed metal band that Paul Gilbert famously masturbates a fretboard for). It's only this page that seems to suggest that, so I'm pretty sure that's wrong, so don't let the supposed fact put you off if you're not a fan of Racer X (likely), or draw you in if you're a massive fan of Racer X (really?!). Tip for future releases, guys: try and normalise the volume of each track so I don't have to tweak the volume knob many times across a whole album.

The overall effect is that I know it's something I would have really enjoyed about a decade ago, and I know a handful of people who can't get enough of this kinda sound that I may pass the link on to; but ultimately it's a compilation album that is consistently fairly pleasant to my ears, but fails to ever excite me. One of the major things this album evokes in me is a sense of nostalgia for my young teenage listening tastes - despite this all being new music, it thoroughly re-treads familiar tropes in an inoffensive and comforting way.

I'm sorry, to both the Ripple Effect, the 23 bands, and anyone reading this. Overall, it was fun enough, but very little stood out as a refreshingly good and/or new. Very solid for genre enthusiasts, but I'm not entirely convinced that even big stoner-rock fans are going to find it entirely fascinating. Listen to it here, and give some attention to some quite-fun obscure bands.

Discuss

Log in or sign up to post.

    •  mikemike
    • Add your comments here!
    •  OllieOllie
    • Todd's nickname is Racer...he wasn't in Racer X
    •  mikemike
    • Had this pointed out on Facebook too!
    •  rickinoppositionrickinopposition
    • Whoops! More reasons that further convince me that this is the worst review I've ever written :p After being bludgeoned by so many pleasantly inoffensive stoner bands, my brain was kinda melting...
    •  OllieOllie
    • Oddly enough, despite being bsigned to Ripple Music and occasionally writing for the site I've not heard this compilation yet...though I have had Ape Machine pointed out to me from it and having grabbed a copy of their album I have to say they're very good.
    •  alanalan
    • rickinopposition says:
      Whoops! More reasons that further convince me that this is the worst review I've ever written :p After being bludgeoned by so many pleasantly inoffensive stoner bands, my brain was kinda melting...


      That's the hardest kind of thing to review. Amazing, awful or comical stuff is far easier!
    •  GarethGareth
    • This pretty much encapsulates how I feel about every stoner release I get given to review.
    •  JackJack
    • Depends what you classify as stoner, a lot of it I just look at as guitar music, it wasn't called stoner back in the 70's it was just heavy rock. If you just look at it as guitar music and if it's good or not it's a more balanced way to look at it
    •  OllieOllie
    • Jack says:
      Depends what you classify as stoner, a lot of it I just look at as guitar music, it wasn't called stoner back in the 70's it was just heavy rock. If you just look at it as guitar music and if it's good or not it's a more balanced way to look at it


      Exactly. Listen to a lot of stuff that Small Stone put out now and most of it isn't really what I would term as stoner but more retro heavy rock like Lord Fowl and Skanska Mord. To me stoner is a pretty narrow kind of sound...Fu Manchu and bands that sound like Fu Manchu. It's a convenient term that a lot of bands and reviewers use. I don't class Stubb as stoner at all, more retro heavy psych stuff, similarly I don't think we're stoner, just heavy bluesy rock and roll. I don't even like the term. I've heard some bands describe themselves as stoner and when you listen to them they sound more like a thrash band or Pantera or something like that. It's all just a variation on good old rock and roll!!!